Project 2025. Charlottesville. “Bloodbath.” Trump’s Afghanistan plan.
ABC News’ debate “moderators” David Muir and Linsey Davis were partisan hacks who operated on behalf of Kamala Harris throughout the night. They “fact-checked” Donald Trump 11 times while allowing multiple lies from Harris to go unchecked.
In fact, they didn’t fact-check a single one of her many lies.
And this is a good thing… at least it could be. For the Trump campaign, it’s a GREAT thing if they choose to capitalize on it. They are already noting how badly the moderators acted…
JUST IN: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. shreds ABC News moderators for ganging up on Trump during the debate and for refusing to fact-check Kamala Harris.
"We had moderators who were clearly biased, who were constantly fact-checking Donald Trump."
"But none of these kind of whoppers… pic.twitter.com/cNAg3kRzJu
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 11, 2024
— Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) September 11, 2024
Trump on the debate: It was THREE ON ONE! pic.twitter.com/HOAZjqPF08
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) September 11, 2024
Sen. Tom Cotton: "I thought it was a 3-on-1 debate. Where were the fact-checks of Kamala Harris?" pic.twitter.com/kPLFFjb9Mz
— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) September 11, 2024
The big loser from #DebateNight2024 is the mainstream media, as @Peoples_Pundit predicted, proving they are incapable of being independent, impartial interlocutors instead of partisan hacks, as they couldn't even keep a simple promise to not intervene as fake "fact checkers."
— Robert Barnes (@barnes_law) September 11, 2024
This is good. We want everyone to know that the debate, like so many things in this and previous elections, was rigged. But it can’t end there.
The Trump team and his surrogates MUST do what ABC News failed to do. They must fact check Harris themselves.
Here’s a good start…
Roll the tape…
Kamala Harris: "There’s no question I’m in favor of banning fracking."
Hundreds of thousands of Pennsylvanians would lose their jobs.#Debate2024 pic.twitter.com/AAtaP6Ycbb
— Daniel Turner (@DanielTurnerPTF) September 11, 2024
Here's a clip of Kamala saying she would confiscate your guns pic.twitter.com/dNXwKlAO5b
— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) September 11, 2024
NEW: ABC News fails to fact-check Kamala Harris after she falsely claimed Trump called neo-Nazis in Charlottesville "very fine people."
The claim was even fact-checked by Snopes.
ABC has spent much of the night "fact-checking" Trump but refused to do the same for Harris.
"But… pic.twitter.com/gJvPbSAybY
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 11, 2024
JUST IN: Former Director of Project 2025 Paul Dans says, "Breaking news: Trump has nothing to do with Project 2025." pic.twitter.com/Tgaqzw1gS3
— Simon Ateba (@simonateba) September 10, 2024
WATCH: @TulsiGabbard fact checks Kamala Harris' pathetic lies.
She tried to say he supports a federal abortion ban — he does not.
She tried to tell the American people that he wants to ban IVF — he does not.
She tried to say he wants to ban birth control — he does not. pic.twitter.com/D9ozAfqXMW
— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) September 11, 2024
This is very likely the last extended interaction we’ll see from Kamala Harris with the press. She’ll do campaign rallies and fundraisers but she won’t take many questions. Maybe she’ll take some in passing. But there will be no other debate. She won’t do any interviews unless she’s allowed to write all the questions. They’re going to sit back and allow her proxies in corporate media to do the work for her.
It’s imperative that every American patriot reaches out to whoever they can to get the facts out there.
- Democrats still want to pin Project 2025 on Trump even though he hasn’t even read it
- Harris is in favor of mandatory gun buybacks even though she pretended not to be during the debate
- Harris wants to ban fracking despite running away from that policy promise over the past month
- She has helped weaponize the DOJ against her political opponent and has been openly giddy about it
- The Biden-Harris regime has not fired anyone despite massive failures on multiple fronts
- She has been in the White House for nearly four years so why would anyone expect another four years to be any better?
The closing argument by Trump was his best. It was important and people need to hear it. And while most commentators are saying he should have gone down that road earlier, I disagree. He made it the punctuation as the closing remark and didn’t give Harris an opportunity to reply.
Donald Trump Delivers Crushing Blow to Kamala Harris in His Closing Statements
“So she just started by saying, she's going to do this, she's going to do that, she's going to do all these wonderful things. Why hasn't she done it?”
“I rebuilt our entire military. She gave a lot… pic.twitter.com/fNgMVR92wU
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) September 11, 2024
September 11 means many things to most Americans. On top of remembering tragedy and acting as a reminder of the fragility of freedom, it also takes on a new, albeit temporary meaning. September 11, 2024, marks the official beginning of the final stretch of the presidential election. It’s go time.
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.




You know how the DemonRats are going to play this as we complain that it was three against one. They’re going to say that Trump couldn’t keep up, that he got angry, and don’t you see how the Conservative pundits are all whining, blah blah blah. This needs to be torn apart NOW and the moderators vilified for their sick biased contributions to try and make Camel look good.
This is exactly the same kind of sh!t they pulled on Trump at the 2020 debate with Biden where the moderator made statements to the point where Trump had to say, “I guess I’m debating you now” Now Trump must insist that Camel do a second debate but with moderators of his choosing with his rules and if she refuses, nail her ass down for being a coward who is incapable of having an honest debate, because she has no policies that were debatable. DUH !!!
Muir and Davis weren’t moderators. They were collaborators.
Too bad you don’t allow your articles to be shared.
Whatever.
Trump did fine, but it would have been a walk-off home run if he had just once asked that punk, Muir: “Dude, am I debating Kamala or you?” And in my mind, I would have loved to hear him follow up with something like: “Maybe you should ask Kamala to leave and you come up on stage. You’d probably deliver a much better performance than she is doing.” I’m sure he was thinking it, but he was probably coached (wrongly) not to attack the moderators.