America First Report
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • Type
    • Original
    • Curated
    • Aggregated
  • Style
    • News
    • Opinions
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
  • About Us
    • Contact
  • America First Newsletter
No Result
View All Result
America First Report
  • Home
  • Type
    • Original
    • Curated
    • Aggregated
  • Style
    • News
    • Opinions
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
  • About Us
    • Contact
  • America First Newsletter
No Result
View All Result
America First Report
No Result
View All Result
Home Style Opinions

With Abdul El-Sayed’s Victory, Michigan Just Became Ground Zero for Stopping the DSA’s March to DC

by Harvey Jones
August 5, 2026
in Opinions, Original
Abdul El-Sayed

The Democratic Socialists of America just won their biggest prize yet, and the man who delivered it insists he has nothing to do with them. Abdul El-Sayed has won the Democratic nomination for Michigan’s open U.S. Senate seat, prevailing over establishment favorite Haley Stevens in the most expensive Democratic Senate primary in American history.

Within hours, the entire socialist apparatus of the American left was celebrating. Bernie Sanders’ machine, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s ad money, every single member of the Squad, and the ground troops of the DSA itself all poured themselves into this race. They know exactly what they won on Tuesday, even if their candidate keeps telling everyone it isn’t what it looks like.

That contradiction is not a footnote to this story. It is the story. The socialist movement inside the Democrat Party has learned something important since Zohran Mamdani took City Hall in New York, and Michigan is where they are testing the lesson.

The label wins in Manhattan. The label loses in Macomb County. So in purple states, the label gets left at the door while everything else, the money, the organizers, the agenda, and the endorsements, walks right in. Most importantly, the DSA’s policies are alive and well in El-Sayed’s platform.

The Socialist Who Says He Isn’t One

Ask El-Sayed directly and he will tell you, as he told the Wall Street Journal last month, “I’m not technically or practically DSA.” Pressed by CNN, he went further. “I am not somebody who is a socialist. I believe in capitalism, I just believe that capitalism has to be regulated.”

Now ask the record. Fox News documented that El-Sayed attended and spoke at six Democratic Socialists of America events between 2017 and 2020. He headlined a fundraiser that raised roughly $10,000 for the Detroit DSA chapter. At that event he was photographed alongside Rep. Rashida Tlaib behind a table displaying a poster of a hand labeled “DSA” strangling a snake labeled “capitalism.”

Detroit DSA organizers have described him warmly as “a longtime friend of Detroit DSA.” In the final stretch of this primary, DSA organizers worked flat out to turn out his vote, and he campaigned alongside Hasan Piker, the streamer whose commentary about America and its enemies would have ended any political career a decade ago.

Days before the vote, every member of the Squad lined up behind him, joining Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Ro Khanna, Ilhan Omar, Ayanna Pressley, Pramila Jayapal, and Summer Lee. Several of those endorsers hold current or former DSA affiliations themselves. A man is entitled to declare his own label. He is not entitled to have the rest of us ignore his fruit.

At last, a conservative news aggregator that does not bow to the woke right.

Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?

The question answers itself. When the fruit is six years of DSA platforms, DSA fundraisers, DSA foot soldiers, and a policy slate of Medicare for All and a previously expressed sympathy for defunding police that his campaign has spent months trying to memory-hole, the tree is not a mystery.

The denial is not evidence against the movement’s advance. The denial is the movement’s advance. Socialism in America has stopped introducing itself.

From Manhattan to the Mitten

Consider the sequence. Mamdani, a proud DSA member, wins the mayoralty of the nation’s largest city. This June, his backing helps propel three left-wing insurgents to victory in New York House primaries, two of them card-carrying DSA members, two of them toppling sitting Democratic incumbents.

In Texas, James Talarico rides record primary turnout past Jasmine Crockett for the Senate nomination. Next Tuesday, Wisconsin Democrats may hand their gubernatorial nomination to Francesca Hong, an open democratic socialist who has voiced support for abolishing the police.

And now Michigan, a state Donald Trump carried in 2024, has nominated the DSA’s longtime friend for the United States Senate on turnout that shattered a record standing since 2020.

This is not a series of coincidences. It is a strategy executing on schedule. Recent polling found that roughly a third of Democratic primary voters now identify as democratic socialists, and they are the most motivated bloc in the party. The activists supply the energy, the Squad supplies the star power, and candidates like El-Sayed supply the deniability. In deep blue cities the movement runs under its own flag. In swing states it runs under camouflage. Different uniforms, same army.

You may have noticed some conservative sites and shows have dropped MyPillow as a sponsor. They’re getting more money from others so they cast Mike Lindell aside. We will NOT stop supporting MyPillow or MyStore. Please use promo code “JDR” to support them AND us.

Why Both Parties Need This Seat

The general election math makes Michigan the hinge of the entire cycle. Democrats have almost no path to retaking the Senate without holding Gary Peters’ open seat. Republicans have not won a Michigan Senate race since 1994, but Mike Rogers came within a whisker in 2024 and now draws the one Democrat the polling suggests he can beat.

Emerson’s independent survey found Stevens and Mallory McMorrow both defeating Rogers in hypothetical matchups while El-Sayed managed only a tie. Democratic primary voters saw those numbers and chose the tie.

El-Sayed understands what is coming. On election night he told supporters that “whatever happens tonight, we have a responsibility to make sure that Mike Rogers never sees the inside of the US Senate,” and his standard answer to the socialism question is to change the subject, dismissing Rogers as “the worst kind of corporatist.”

That is not a rebuttal. It is an evasion, and Michigan’s general electorate, unlike its primary electorate, tends to notice evasions.

Democrats now face an uncomfortable November. Their establishment spent record millions warning that this nominee could not win purple Michigan, and their own voters overruled them. If the party rallies behind him anyway, it ratifies the leftward capture its centrists claim to resist. If it holds back and he loses, the socialist wing will spend 2027 arguing betrayal. Either way, the mask question follows the party into every swing state in the country.

More Than One Seat

This is why defeating El-Sayed in November matters far beyond one line on the Senate map. A Rogers victory would do something no cable segment or think tank paper can do. It would prove, in the industrial heartland, that the camouflage strategy fails the moment it leaves the coastal metropolis. It would tell every DSA-adjacent candidate eyeing a 2028 statewide run that shedding the label does not shed the record, and that voters in places where people build things and attend church can still tell a grape from a thorn.

An El-Sayed victory would prove the opposite. It would certify that a candidate can headline socialist fundraisers, pose behind posters of socialism strangling capitalism, absorb the movement’s money and manpower, deny all of it with a straight face, and win statewide in a Trump state. That playbook would be photocopied in all fifty states before Thanksgiving.

Michigan voters will not merely be choosing a senator this fall. They will be deciding whether socialism in America must still say its name to gain power. The movement has already answered for itself. In November, the rest of Michigan gets to answer back.

Fastest Growing





Two Storms, One Harvest

Empty Shelves

Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.

What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.

Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.

This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.

Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.

Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.

The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running

While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.

The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.

Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.

The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.

Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.

The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?

The System Has No Slack Left

The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.

Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.

There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.

The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.

What Joseph Knew

Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.

Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.

Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.

Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.

None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.

Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.

Tags: DemocratsDSAElection 2026LedeMarxistsStickyTop Story
Next Post
Washington Fire

Washington State Arson Suspect Was Questioned About 2 Other Blazes in 2025





  • About Us
  • America First Newsletter
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
Site Operated By JD Rucker.

© 2023 America First Report.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Original
  • Curated
  • Aggregated
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

© 2023 America First Report.