America First Report
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • Type
    • Original
    • Curated
    • Aggregated
  • Style
    • News
    • Opinions
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
  • About Us
    • Contact
  • America First Newsletter
No Result
View All Result
America First Report
  • Home
  • Type
    • Original
    • Curated
    • Aggregated
  • Style
    • News
    • Opinions
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
  • About Us
    • Contact
  • America First Newsletter
No Result
View All Result
America First Report
No Result
View All Result
Home Type Original

Dealing With Newly Awakened Anti-Vaxxers

More people are coming around. Whether they're experiencing adverse reactions or hearing about it from others, they're concerned. We need to be kind to some, though not all of them.

by JD Rucker
October 14, 2022
in Original, Podcasts, Videos
Piers Morgan

Those of us who have been pushing for the truth about the Covid-19 “vaccines” to come out have known they were neither safe nor effective for a long time. Now that more Americans are becoming aware of this and are starting to push back against the old narrative, it’s incumbent on us to keep pushing the truth forward.

The last few days, several stories came out that really pushed the narrative forward. As I discussed on today’s episode of The JD Rucker Show, it is compelling that we are seeing some of the old “vaxx-nannies” coming around. We have seen this shift due to more “approved” evidence making it into the mainstream. It’s somewhat insulting considering that the evidence that’s being “approved” for dissemination on corporate media is often stuff we’ve talked about in alternative media for a year or longer. Better late then never, I supposed.

There are three types of people who are waking up to the realities of the jabs. We should handle them all very differently. The vast majority are the average Americans and citizens of the world who likely complied by getting jabbed, boosted, even double-boosted, but who are now starting to realize that may have been a mistake. They are interested in learning more about the long-term adverse reactions. In many cases, it’s because they’re experiencing them.

For these people, we should be compassionate and patient. It may feel like the right time to make it an “I told you so” moment when Uncle Larry starts asking about the jabs. We may feel like rubbing it in his face that he didn’t invite us to Christmas dinner last year, but now is not the time to be haughty about being right. We will need allies in the near future. We need people who will help us fight the good fight because Pandemic Panic Theater isn’t over. Moreover, if we’re kind now as they wake up to the jab conspiracy, imagine how much more willing they’ll be to talk to us when the Climate Change Cult starts making more tyrannical moves.

The second group of people coming around to the jabs are the ones I believe were incentivized to stay pro-vaccine. These are the healthcare professionals, pharmaceutical professionals, and politicians. It’s sad that we have to classify pro-vaxx nurses in the same category as dirty politicians, but both had incentives to keep the jabs going. For medical professionals, it was about job security. Those who spoke out against the jabs lost their jobs or had their medical licenses reviewed. The same is true for those in pharmaceuticals.

As for the politicians, I’m even less sympathetic to them than I am toward the medical professionals who sold us out to save their careers. Any politician who questioned the safety or efficacy of the jabs was instantly and permanently labeled as an anti-vaxx politician. It’s a stigma that, for political expediency, doesn’t bode well for their careers. Many politicians spoke well about or even promoted the vaccines. That doesn’t mean they’re necessarily evil people. It just means they’re politicians.

To be clear, I am NOT saying the doctors, pharmacists, and politicians who supported the jabs should be given a free pass. They all still made very poor and dangerous decisions to support the jabs when it was clear early on they weren’t going to do what it was claimed they were going to do. An honorable and intelligent doctor, pharmacist, or politician would have, at the very least, stayed agnostic toward the jabs and still kept their careers. Instead, many promoted them against their own better judgment. That means that they are selfish and opportunistic, but not necessarily evil or stupid.

The third group of people are the ones that are either evil or stupid. These are the celebrities, journalists, and influencers of various types who had no incentive to push the jabs but did so anyway. We can bypass analysis of Hollywood celebrities and other entertainment elites since it didn’t take the jabs to make us realize the vast majority of them are both evil AND stupid.

The ONLY faith-driven, patriotic news curator that opposes the left AND the “woke right.”

What about the journalists and influencers? They likely didn’t have incentives to push the jabs, though some of them did. The ones who sold their influence for fat checks from Big Pharma or government are evil. They may also be stupid, but at the very least they’re evil and likely have blood on their hands so they could land a huge payday.

The journalists and influencers who didn’t get paid are definitely stupid and possibly evil. Piers Morgan falls into this category and I talked about him during today’s show. He’s suddenly changing his tune about anti-vaxxers after ridiculing us viciously for months. I don’t believe he got paid to do it. I think he simply didn’t do his job by looking at the data available to him before making his declarations that everyone needs to get jabbed. Considering his tremendous reach, it’s very likely that he does have blood on his hands because there are almost certainly people who got jabbed because of his push.

He’s not alone.

For this third group, I have no sympathy. I don’t want to talk to them because in doing so I would certainly return the vitriol to them that they directed toward us. They don’t get a pass of any kind. They’re either evil, stupid, or both. They should never be trusted again to deliver any opinion on anything of importance. If they want to become celebrity chefs or get on a reality TV show, that’s fine. Otherwise, their privileges to speak intelligently about anything should be revoked.

We need allies. As more people come around to the truth about the jabs, it behooves us to not try to rub it in their faces when they realize we were right all along. We need to treat them kindly and hopefully work toward converting them to our frame of thought. At the very least, we should be able to get them to start questioning things. Perhaps someday, they’ll question everything as they should.

Fighting Marxists





Two Storms, One Harvest

Empty Shelves

Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.

What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.

Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.

This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.

Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.

Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.

The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running

While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.

The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.

Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.

The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.

Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.

The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?

The System Has No Slack Left

The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.

Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.

There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.

The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.

What Joseph Knew

Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.

Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.

Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.

Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.

None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.

Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.

Tags: Anti-VaxxCoronavirusCovid-19LedePiers MorganThe JD Rucker ShowTop StoryVaccines
Next Post
IMF

Economists Warn: IMF, World Bank May Have Little Space to Maneuver as They Lend Record Amounts to Poorest Countries

Comments 3

  1. Sandra Miller says:
    4 years ago

    Interesting article. We did not get the jab and don’t plan to. But am wondering what the pharm industry is going to do with the covid vax they have in stock – especially since their promoters are changing their tune?

    Reply
  2. Garion60 says:
    4 years ago

    “For these people, we should be compassionate and patient. It may feel like the right time to make it an “I told you so” moment when Uncle Larry starts asking about the jabs.”

    NOPE! These are the same FOOLS who banned their family and friends…shunned them because they were UN-VAXXED. Treated them like they had the plague…and would spread it to THEM. How dare you insinuate that we should be ‘kind’ to these SHEEPLE??? Do you really think that the ‘next time’ something comes around that they won’t also be first in line? Gimme a break…

    FJB!! TRUMP WON!! MAGA!!!

    Reply
  3. Mr_Yesterday says:
    4 years ago

    Compassion has limits. The line in the sand is the use of force. I’m with Ron Paul on these sorts of issues relating to the use of force or coercion. “Good ideas do not require force.” He also said this which I have an image quote of, copy this for you here; “Americans should pause and reflect on the lies they’re being sold. Masks are just a form of psychological manipulation. Many reputable physicians and scientists have said they are worthless and potentially harmful. Lock downs are meant to condition people to obey without question. A nation of people whom just do what they are told by ‘experts’ without question is a nation ripe for decent into total tyranny.”

    And…. Here we are. I told you so is more than justified because when people are leaderless, they need leaders. Lead how you feel best but it’s going to take more than kind words to break peoples minds from the mass formation psychosis and Stockholm syndrome they currently find themselves immersed in. Whether they realize this happened to them or not is of no consequence. They need shocked out of it one way or another.

    The beatings will continue until morale improves. We said no to vaccines and we meant it. No does not mean anything other than no. Good ideas do not require force. If in doubt, opt out. There is no actual immediate need or requirement to pick a side or make a decision about these things, any perceived pressure is simply an illusion, taking advantage of humans natural desire to go along to get along. Peace sells but who’s buying? One man against the tide. Even if I’m the only one, which quite often I was, I resist out of principal. I opted out for principal, not because of specific facts. Anyone whom seeks to use force, is not someone I can trust. Get your mind around it, there is no reason for people to be confused or even need to ‘learn the science’, if they would merely hold to solid American principals rooted in the ideals of Liberty.

    For god. For country. A nation of prosperity, ran by the people, for the people. We The People. If you want to wake them up, hand them a full sized framed copy of the Declaration of Independence and The Constitution of the United States to put on their wall. Strongly recommend they read it. So, I also just solved all your christmas shopping needs. You can thank me later.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *





  • About Us
  • America First Newsletter
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
Site Operated By JD Rucker.

© 2023 America First Report.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Original
  • Curated
  • Aggregated
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

© 2023 America First Report.