America First Report
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • Type
    • Original
    • Curated
    • Aggregated
  • Style
    • News
    • Opinions
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
  • About Us
    • Contact
  • America First Newsletter
No Result
View All Result
America First Report
  • Home
  • Type
    • Original
    • Curated
    • Aggregated
  • Style
    • News
    • Opinions
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
  • About Us
    • Contact
  • America First Newsletter
No Result
View All Result
America First Report
No Result
View All Result
Home Type Curated

Breaking Down What’s in the Reports Tulsi Gabbard Dropped on Anthony Fauci

by Lewis Kamb, USRTK
June 20, 2026
in Curated, Opinions
Anthony Fauci

(USRTK)—A newly declassified Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory assessment from May 2020 concluded that all of the conditions necessary for an accidental release of a laboratory-modified coronavirus were present at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China before the COVID-19 pandemic erupted.

The report was among nearly 400 pages of COVID-19 origins records released Thursday by the outgoing Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard as part of a broader document dump that included internal Intelligence Community (IC) emails, scientific publications, diplomatic cables, congressional correspondence and documents related to U.S.-funded coronavirus research in Wuhan.

The Lawrence Livermore report found that Wuhan researchers possessed the capabilities, materials and research programs that would have been required to create and accidentally release a coronavirus adapted to infect humans.

“We assess all of the necessary conditions for an accidental release of a laboratory-modified coronavirus – specifically a coronavirus adapted to recognize human cell receptors – were present at the Chinese Wuhan Institute of Virology in mid-to-late 2019,” the report states.

As a result, analysts at the California-based national laboratory said they placed “equal weight” on three possible scenarios for the origins of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that spawned the pandemic: a lab-modification followed by an accidental leak, natural emergence or an accidental release of a naturally-occurring virus from a laboratory.

The previously unreleased report was prepared on May 27, 2020 by Lawrence Livermore’s Z Program, which supports U.S. intelligence and national security missions. The report states that it also “used additional intelligence information from a CIA Field Analytic Conversation.” Large portions of the document remain redacted.

The report appears to be the same document that CIA whistleblower James Erdman III testified last month had concluded all prerequisite conditions for a lab leak were present at WIV but was inexplicably excluded from the IC’s public assessments throughout 2020 and shared only in a classified annex the following year. Erdman identified that record as a May 2020 report that was produced by “a DOE national lab.”

ODNI’s press office did not immediately respond Friday to a request for comment about the records.

At last, a conservative news aggregator that does not bow to the woke right.

The Lawrence Livermore assessment identified four conditions that would have been necessary for a laboratory-origin scenario. Those included access to a virus closely related to SARS-CoV-2, use of a reverse genetics system capable of modifying coronaviruses, experiments involving human ACE2 receptors and biosafety failures or lab accidents involving coronavirus research.

The report stopped short of concluding that SARS-CoV-2 was engineered or that a lab leak occurred. Rather, it argued that available information showed that the WIV possessed the capabilities and research activities needed for such a scenario.

The ODNI’s release of declassified records came two days after the lapse of a 180-day deadline set by the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act. That law, passed in December, required the intelligence Community to review and publicly release additional COVID-19 origins intelligence. The law directed the Director of National Intelligence to conduct a declassification review, along with the heads of intelligence agencies, of intelligence on coronavirus research at the WIV, funding sources for that research, gain-of-function work and Chinese government efforts to obstruct investigations into the pandemic’s origins.

ODNI did not specifically cite the law when releasing the Livermore report and other records on Thursday. The release also came on the eve of Gabbard’s departure from ODNI after she announced her resignation last month.

Also included in Thursday’s release was a final progress report from the EcoHealth Alliance’s NIH-funded bat coronavirus research project that partnered with the WIV. Much of the information contained in that report has been publicly available previously through congressional investigations, FOIA disclosures and media reports, but its inclusion with the newly released records provides additional context about the types of coronavirus experiments that were conducted through the now defunct nonprofit’s collaboration with Chinese researchers before the pandemic.

The new records also provide additional insight into how U.S. government analysts evaluated competing origin theories during the earliest months of the pandemic.

You may have noticed some conservative sites and shows have dropped MyPillow as a sponsor. They’re getting more money from others so they cast Mike Lindell aside. We will NOT stop supporting MyPillow or MyStore. Please use promo code “JDR” to support them AND us.

Newly released emails show intelligence officials debating gain-of-function research, reverse genetics techniques, the virus’s unusual furin cleavage site and competing scientific explanations for how SARS-CoV-2 emerged.

In one March 2020 exchange, an analyst cautioned colleagues to set “a very high threshold” before concluding the virus resulted from gain-of-function research – lab manipulations that increase a virus’s infectivity and transmissibility to other species.

While acknowledging concerns about coronavirus research at the WIV, the analyst wrote that “Occam’s razor is the best guidance here,” arguing that natural explanations such as viral recombination remained plausible and shouldn’t be discounted. At the same time, the analyst stressed that a possible laboratory origin deserved rigorous scrutiny. “I’m not saying WIV isn’t guilty of creating this strain, but I think we need to pin it down hard before we make this assessment,” the analyst wrote. “I think the IC needs to be very thorough with its analysis.”

The emails show analysts grappling with evidence pointing in different directions. Some records discussed reports concerning coronavirus experiments at the WIV, while others circulated scientific papers arguing that SARS-CoV-2 wasn’t engineered and may have arisen naturally. The exchanges suggest that intelligence analysts were evaluating competing hypotheses rather than trying to confirm a settled conclusion.

The documents build on records previously obtained and reported by U.S. Right To Know showing that Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) analysts were already considering lab-origin scenarios as early as March 2020, months before the issue became a major public debate. A genomic analysis by scientists at the DIA’s National Center for Medical Intelligence (NCMI) published internally three months later also found the scenario that an engineered virus escaped from the WIV plausible, and became one of the first, and only, full assessments to emerge publicly. But that report, obtained via a FOIA lawsuit, also wasn’t referenced when the ODNI issued a public summary on intelligence assessments in its 2021 90-day origins study.

While the earlier DIA records established that intelligence analysts were examining the possibility of a lab leak early on, the newly released Lawrence Livermore assessment partially provides one of the only explanations to date of why some U.S. government experts believed the scenario warranted serious consideration at such an early stage in the pandemic.

ODNI’s records disclosure Thursday was accompanied by an agency press release that went further than what the documents themselves appear to show, accusing former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Director Anthony Fauci of manipulating intelligence assessments and lying to Congress about his contacts with intelligence officials.

The records provide a more limited picture. Among them were email exchanges showing intelligence officials discussing Fauci, circulating scientific materials associated with him and receiving briefings from him as they evaluated competing origin theories. A July 2021 email chain shows officials considered asking Fauci to review a COVID-19 origins assessment before deciding against the idea because he would be viewed as having a conflict of interest. The records also show analysts receiving scientific views from other officials at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) that were not always aligned with Fauci’s public position backing a natural-origins scenario while actively debating lab-origin scenarios and other evidence.

But the press release also independently cited an unnamed whistleblower’s testimony that alleged retaliation against analysts who challenged Fauci’s preferred conclusions on the virus’s origins. That description closely tracks with last month’s congressional testimony from Erdman, a CIA senior operations officer who had been detailed to an ODNI task force investigating COVID origins.

Erdman told the Senate Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee that CIA analysts repeatedly concluded a lab leak was the likely origin between 2021 and 2023, only to have their findings altered, buried or overridden by agency management. He also accused Fauci of shaping which outside scientists the IC consulted with and alleged broader retaliation and obstruction by the CIA. Erdman acknowledged, however, that he found no explicit evidence of a coordinated cover-up.

A CIA spokesperson has dismissed Erdman’s testimony as “dishonest political theater masquerading as a congressional hearing.” The whistleblower testimony referenced in the ODNI press release has been referred to the Intelligence Community’s Inspector General, the release stated.

Fastest Growing




Starting the Day With a Scripture-Inspired Roast Helps Center Your Thoughts on Eternal Truths Amid Temporal Pressures

The world can seem chaotic, especially right after we wake up. Many believers start their mornings reaching for something familiar — a hot cup of coffee — yet end up settling for mediocre brews that do little more than deliver a caffeine jolt. The daily grind of life, with its endless distractions, news cycles, and responsibilities, can leave even the most faithful feeling spiritually parched alongside their physical fatigue. What if your morning ritual could do more than wake you up? What if it could ground you in truth, nourish your body with exceptional quality, and quietly advance a kingdom purpose at the same time?

That’s the promise — and the reality — behind Promised Grounds Coffee. This Christian-founded company doesn’t just roast beans; it approaches every step as an act of worship and discipleship. By selecting only the top 10% of specialty-grade beans, ethically sourced from dedicated farmers in Central and South America, and small-batch roasting them with reverence in Austin, Texas, Promised Grounds delivers what many describe as the best coffee available — never burnt, never bland, but rich with origin stories and layered flavors that honor God’s creation.

From the vibrant Psalm 27 Roast (a light, bright medium option) to the bold yet peaceful 2 Timothy 1:7 Decaf, each bag carries a Scripture verse that turns your daily pour into a gentle reminder of faith. And through their Ounce Per Ounce Promise, every ounce of coffee you enjoy provides an equal ounce of clean water to families in need via partnership with Filter of Hope — literally brewing hope for body and soul, one cup at a time.

The challenge for today’s Christians runs deeper than finding a decent cup. In an age of convenience-driven consumerism, it’s easy to support companies that dilute values or remain silent on matters of faith. Many believers want their everyday choices — from what they drink to how they spend — to reflect discipleship rather than just convenience. Promised Grounds solves this by weaving Christian excellence into the entire process: beans nurtured with prayerful stewardship by farming families, roasted as an offering rather than a commodity, and packaged with Bible verses to encourage a mindset of gratitude and purpose from the first sip. Reviewers consistently praise the smooth, rich profiles — whether enjoyed black in a drip maker, iced on a warm day, or shared in fellowship — noting how the quality stands toe-to-toe with premium secular brands while delivering something far more meaningful.

This integration of faith and flavor addresses a real need in Christian households and ministries. Busy parents, church leaders, and remote workers alike report that starting the day with a Scripture-inspired roast helps center their thoughts on eternal truths amid temporal pressures. The coffee’s exceptional character — bright citrus notes in lighter roasts or deep chocolate undertones in bolder ones — comes from meticulous selection and careful roasting that respects the bean’s natural gifts rather than masking them. It’s the kind of coffee that elevates a simple quiet time, fuels productive workdays, or sparks meaningful conversations when shared at Bible studies or outreach events. And because it’s ethically sourced with integrity, every purchase supports sustainable livelihoods for farmers who treat their crops like family harvests.

For those leading churches or small groups, the impact multiplies. Promised Grounds offers bundles and options perfect for hospitality ministries, turning ordinary coffee service into an opportunity to point people toward the living water of Christ. Imagine greeting visitors with a warm cup whose very bag carries God’s Word — a subtle yet powerful witness that aligns with the Great Commission. The company’s Texas roots and commitment to “brewing hope” resonate especially with believers who value American enterprise paired with global compassion.

Of course, quality alone isn’t enough if the experience feels out of reach. Promised Grounds keeps it accessible with practical perks like free shipping on orders over $40, sample sets for discovering favorites, and thoughtful add-ons such as faith-themed mugs. Whether you prefer whole beans for fresh grinding, grounds for convenience, or even bulk options for larger households and ministries, the result is consistently superior coffee that makes discipleship feel integrated rather than added on.

As you consider how to align even the smallest habits with your walk with God, Promised Grounds Coffee stands out as a refreshing solution. It tackles the dual problems of subpar daily sustenance and disconnected consumption by offering a product that genuinely excels in taste while advancing a mission of clean water, farmer dignity, and scriptural encouragement. Believers who make the switch often describe it as more than a beverage upgrade — it becomes part of their rhythm of gratitude, a daily invitation to remember that every good gift comes from above.

If you’re ready to transform your mornings (and perhaps your church gatherings) with coffee that honors both exceptional craftsmanship and Christian values, I encourage you to explore what Promised Grounds has to offer. One sip at a time, you’ll be nourishing your body, refreshing your spirit, and participating in something far greater — all while enjoying what truly is among the best coffee available.

Tags: Anthony FauciLedeStickyTop StoryUSRTK
Next Post
Jasmine Crockett

Black Voters Aren't Sold on James Talarico and Jasmine Crockett Isn't Answering His Calls





  • About Us
  • America First Newsletter
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
Site Operated By JD Rucker.

© 2023 America First Report.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Original
  • Curated
  • Aggregated
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

© 2023 America First Report.