All of the implications of Donald Trump’s substantial presidential victory are still being sorted out. Along with the executive and legislative agenda that the Trump/Vance administration will no doubt put into place, along with the geopolitical implications with the United States’ friends, allies and enemies alike, there is also the judiciary. The president appoints federal judges, subject to Senate approval — and for at least the next two years, the Senate will be comfortably in Republican hands, and thanks to Harry Reid, the filibuster no longer applies to Senate approval of judges.
This includes, of course, the Supreme Court. President-elect Trump, in his first term, appointed three Supreme Court justices. President Biden has appointed one (who is, I hasten to note, not a biologist) and now won’t get a second.
But look at the Supreme Court today, and you see two right-leaning justices that are good candidates for retirement in the next two years – Samuel Alito (74) and Clarence Thomas (76.) While neither has spoken out since the election, the logical time for either to retire would be in the next two years, so that President Trump can appoint an originalist replacement. That may well result in Donald Trump having appointed a majority of the Supreme Court. The implications of that could be huge.
Republicans are gearing up to lock in their remake of the judiciary under President-elect Donald Trump and a new Senate majority, including potentially installing several more conservative Supreme Court justices.
Having already picked three Supreme Court justices in his first term — who were critical in overturning abortion rights — Trump will have appointed a majority of the court if he lands two more.
It’s important to note that the court did not “overturn abortion rights.” The court did what the Constitution dictates: sent the issue back to the states, to be determined by the people’s elected state legislatures. This is a lie that just keeps being repeated, and it’s long past its sell-by date. […]
— Read More: redstate.com
What Would You Do If Pharmacies Couldn’t Provide You With Crucial Medications or Antibiotics?
The medication supply chain from China and India is more fragile than ever since Covid. The US is not equipped to handle our pharmaceutical needs. We’ve already seen shortages with antibiotics and other medications in recent months and pharmaceutical challenges are becoming more frequent today.
Our partners at Jase Medical offer a simple solution for Americans to be prepared in case things go south. Their “Jase Case” gives Americans emergency antibiotics they can store away while their “Jase Daily” offers a wide array of prescription drugs to treat the ailments most common to Americans.
They do this through a process that embraces medical freedom. Their secure online form allows board-certified physicians to prescribe the needed drugs. They are then delivered directly to the customer from their pharmacy network. The physicians are available to answer treatment related questions.
