Pro-abortion rhetoric continues to expand in the United States as abortion advocates dive deeper into the claim that induced abortion — the direct and intentional act of killing a preborn baby — is somehow a treatment for health conditions during pregnancy, including cancer. Poll results released this fall showed that a third (33%) of oncology fellows report that they “perceived” that pro-life laws “affected their ability to deliver at least one aspect of quality care for their patients.”
The results of the poll were published as “Perceived impact of abortion access on quality of cancer care and on future practice location decisions among oncology fellow physicians” by JCO Oncology Practice, an American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Journal. Of the 1,884 US medical oncology fellows who took the ASCO Medical Oncology In-Training Exam (ITE), 1,254 opted to partake in a post-ITE survey assessing “perceived (1) effect of abortion policies on ability to provide 9 key aspects of quality cancer care, including care access and delays, trust, and professional well-being and (2) impact of abortion restrictions on quality care in decisions of future practice location.” Thirty-three percent said that they believed pro-life laws would affect their ability to deliver at least one aspect of quality care for their cancer patients.
In addition, 51% of all fellows reported they will likely consider the abortion-related laws of a state when deciding where to practice medicine. However, the research notes that “More fellows training in states where abortion is legal report being likely to consider the impact of local abortion policies on care in future practice location decisions (55%) than those training in abortion-restricted states (45%).”
This signifies that those who trained in oncology in states with pro-life laws were less likely to see those laws as a threat to their ability to care for their pregnant oncology patients.
Women who have been through pregnancy while facing cancer diagnoses offered their stories as examples of how doctors trained to see abortion as a treatment for cancer often usher women toward abortion rather than actually treat them and their babies both as patients. They say that it was only after they refused abortion that doctors presented them with true options. […]
— Read More: www.liveaction.org
What Would You Do If Pharmacies Couldn’t Provide You With Crucial Medications or Antibiotics?
The medication supply chain from China and India is more fragile than ever since Covid. The US is not equipped to handle our pharmaceutical needs. We’ve already seen shortages with antibiotics and other medications in recent months and pharmaceutical challenges are becoming more frequent today.
Our partners at Jase Medical offer a simple solution for Americans to be prepared in case things go south. Their “Jase Case” gives Americans emergency antibiotics they can store away while their “Jase Daily” offers a wide array of prescription drugs to treat the ailments most common to Americans.
They do this through a process that embraces medical freedom. Their secure online form allows board-certified physicians to prescribe the needed drugs. They are then delivered directly to the customer from their pharmacy network. The physicians are available to answer treatment related questions.
