One in five Swiss hospital workers has suffered heart damage after the COVID-19 booster shots. The latest research is finding that heart damage from the COVID-19 “vaccines” is not only real, but it is also more common and more severe than the mainstream media or ruling class are letting on.
The study called Sex-specific differences in myocardial injury incidence after COVID-19 mRNA-1273 Booster Vaccination, found that one in 35 healthcare workers at a Swiss Hospital showed signs of a heart injury associated with the mRNA-1273 Moderna vaccine.
The study authors wrote: “mRNA-1273 booster vaccination-associated elevation of markers of myocardial injury occurred in about one out of 35 persons (2.8%), a greater incidence than estimated in meta-analyses of hospitalized cases with myocarditis (estimated incidence 0.0035%) after the second vaccination.”
In the study, individuals who experienced heart damage from the vaccine were followed for 30 days. After a month, about half of the vaccine injured group had unusually high levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, which indicates sub-clinical heart damage. The sharp increase in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T began on the third day after vaccination. For purposes of the study, levels had to be at least 8.9 nano grams per liter in women and 15.5 nano grams per liter in men to be considered elevated.
Out of 40 patients who had elevated levels of cardiac troponin, 22 suffered from “vaccine-associated myocardial injury.” Twenty of the injured patients were women and their median age was a young 46. None of the patients had a history of heart issues, either. At least two patients suffered chest pain and another two suffered myocarditis within the first 30 days. -Natural News
This is not the first study to confirm that the COVID-19 injections cause heart damage.
If the ruling class and its propagandists can convince the public to be injected several times with a “vaccine” that is this destructive, imagine what the naive masses will do once a real plandemic is released.
Sound off about this story on our End Medical Tyranny Substack.
Article cross-posted from SHTF Plan.
What Would You Do If Pharmacies Couldn’t Provide You With Crucial Medications or Antibiotics?
The medication supply chain from China and India is more fragile than ever since Covid. The US is not equipped to handle our pharmaceutical needs. We’ve already seen shortages with antibiotics and other medications in recent months and pharmaceutical challenges are becoming more frequent today.
Our partners at Jase Medical offer a simple solution for Americans to be prepared in case things go south. Their “Jase Case” gives Americans emergency antibiotics they can store away while their “Jase Daily” offers a wide array of prescription drugs to treat the ailments most common to Americans.
They do this through a process that embraces medical freedom. Their secure online form allows board-certified physicians to prescribe the needed drugs. They are then delivered directly to the customer from their pharmacy network. The physicians are available to answer treatment related questions.
Very good article: awhile back, a large cluster of doctors in the same region of Canada began dropping dead (UCOD) after their latest spikevax booster shot which was mandatory for them.
In the same timeframe, healthcare workers in Denmark —- according to a recent study from there — who received booster shots from the same batch also experienced side effects of a serious nature.
The first batches go to healthcare/hospital workers, the area where it is easiest to control mortality details and data —- as in fabrication of cause of death, etc.
Is it intentional to wipe out the medical sector?!?! Or happenstance???
I do not pretend to know, but do know that spike proteins were recognized as cytotoxic going back to HIV in the 1980s — why the sudden maedical science amnesia?!
Sorry, can you explain how you get 1 in 5 when the study you cite says 1 in 35? I may very well may be dense and the obvious is eluding me, but I wanted to make sure because I told my son this and now I’m reading more closely and it seems to indicate 1 in 35. Maybe that’s just a mistake on the editor’s part putting 1 in 5 when it should have been 1 in 35? Otherwise, thank you for the information and I really appreciate you taking the time to inform us!