A Supreme Court ruling against government pressure to avoid business with disfavored groups and a 15-month-long congressional inquiry into surreptitious federal influence on COVID-19 origin narratives could together shape one of the most awaited SCOTUS decisions of the term.
The 9-0 ruling last week reinstating the National Rifle Association’s First Amendment lawsuit against New York’s former financial services superintendent, for “encourag[ing]” regulated entities to stop providing NRA-endorsed insurance programs , adds more wrinkles to oral arguments in the social media censorship case by GOP states and squelched doctors against the feds.
The doctors’ lawyers at the New Civil Liberties Alliance, which is seeking reinstatement of an injunction against federal pressure to censor purported misinformation, sent document preservation letters Monday based on emails that NCLA says suggest that federal officials “intentionally schemed” to evade Freedom of Information Act requests – evidence that could be pivotal to their case. […]
— Read More: justthenews.com
